290 Midpark Way SE
Medical/Dental Office · low-rise office building · built 1980 · 290 Midpark Way SE

290 Midpark Way SE is a 14.4 m low-rise office building in Midnapore, Calgary, recorded on the City assessment roll as built in 1980. Its main structure is the 370th tallest office roof of the 775 ranked in this record, and 2nd of 10 in Midnapore. The City assesses the parcel at $2.7M on the 2026 roll, 549th of 822 sites in the record by assessed value. The nearest CTrain platform is Shawnessy, 488 m away in a straight line. 71 scheduled transit trips call within 300 m of the parcel on a weekday. Since 2012 the City has recorded 12 building permits and 1 development permit on the parcel, the largest a $221,000 clinic permit for alteration, applied for in 2023.
- Civic address
- 290 Midpark Way SE, Calgary, AB
- Community
- Midnapore (MID)
- City sub-property use
- C103 Medical/Dental Office · all Medical/Dental Office sites
- Land use district
- I-B — Industrial - Business (Industrial)
- Height rank
- #370 of 785 citywide · #2 of 10 in Midnapore
- Footprint to parcel
- 19% of the parcel under LiDAR footprints
- Parcel pieces
- 1 titled piece · roll 156128506
- Coordinates
- 50.909433, -114.063866
Slav Loban and the Commercially × Real Broker team give Calgary commercial owners a confidential pricing opinion based on the public record shown on this page: assessment history, permits, land use and the surrounding market. It is a broker’s opinion of value, not a formal appraisal. You do not need to be ready to list to start the conversation.
Massing and site plan
Left: isometric massing of every LiDAR structure on the parcel, at true scale, viewed from the south-west with 3.9 m storey lines. Right: plan of the parcel with surrounding footprints, Plus 15 walkways and nearby stations. Open this building in the 3D city →
How it compares
Roof height against the Midnapore median and tallest, and against the city.
Access
Public-geometry tests only; confirm routes, entrances and hours with the building.
CTrain
Nearest station: Shawnessy, 488 m straight-line (route 201).
Plus 15
Outside the Plus 15 network area.
Cycling
The best-rated cycling facility within 400 m of the parcel is a major street (On-Street Bikeway), 107 m away.
Winter access
The parcel fronts a Priority 1 snow and ice clearing route, 19 m from its edge. Priority 1 routes are cleared first after a snowfall.
Accessible crossing
No accessible pedestrian signal lies within 400 m of the parcel.
Straight-line tests against The City of Calgary Calgary Bikeways, Snow and Ice Clearing Priority Routes and Traffic Signals, retrieved 2026-09-24. Bikeways are ranked by the City's comfort level, where 1 is a protected lane and 4 a major street. Snow priority is a clearing order, not a clearing time. An accessible pedestrian signal gives audible and tactile crossing cues; a signal recorded as unknown is not counted as having none.
Transit service
Scheduled Calgary Transit service at the door, not only the distance to a platform.
71 scheduled transit trips call within 300 m of this parcel on a representative weekday, 8 of them between 07:00 and 09:00, across 2 routes and 2 stops. The closest stop is SB Midpark BV @ Midpark GA SE, 140 m away.
| Service class | Trips on the service day |
|---|---|
| REGULAR | 71 |
Routes: 11 Southwest Loop · 12 Southwest Loop.
Calgary Transit Scheduling Data (GTFS), service day 2026-09-28 inside the 2026-09-15 to 2026-12-20 service period. A trip is counted once however many stops it calls at inside the radius. Schedules change each service period; this is the schedule, not observed service.
Parking
What the City’s own tariff record says about kerbside parking beside this parcel.
No Active paid on-street parking zone lies within 200 m of this parcel in the City’s tariff dataset. That is not a statement that parking is unavailable: free, permit-only and off-street parking are not recorded in this source.
Assessment history
Assessed values are The City of Calgary’s taxation figures by roll year, not sale prices or rents; Alberta does not publish transaction prices.
Roll 156128506 · Medical/Dental Office
Published values by roll year
| Roll year | Assessed value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | $4.7M | — |
| 2006 | $4.1M | -12.7% |
| 2007 | $5.7M | 39.3% |
| 2008 | $7.9M | 38.2% |
| 2009 | $8.4M | 6.6% |
| 2010 | $7.5M | -11.8% |
| 2011 | $6.5M | -12.2% |
| 2012 | $7.0M | 6.4% |
| 2013 | $8.6M | 23.1% |
| 2014 | $7.2M | -16.6% |
| 2015 | $12.0M | 67.4% |
| 2016 | $10.1M | -15.9% |
| 2017 | $11.2M | 10.7% |
| 2018 | $10.0M | -10.6% |
| 2019 | $5.8M | -41.8% |
| 2020 | $5.1M | -11.4% |
| 2021 | $4.3M | -15.4% |
| 2022 | $4.0M | -8.7% |
| 2023 | $4.5M | 12.6% |
| 2024 | $5.1M | 13.2% |
| 2025 | $2.9M | -43.3% |
| 2026 | $2.7M | -4.5% |
Development and building permits
Applications the City has located on this parcel since 2012, from the Development Permits and Building Permits datasets.
Recent development permits 1 since 2012
| Applied | Permit | Category · description | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-29 | DP2019-0451 | Change of Use - Permitted Use CHANGE OF USE: CONVENIENCE FOOD STORE | Released Approval |
Recent building permits 12 since 2012 · 2 in the City’s office class
| Applied | Permit | Class · work | Est. cost | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-01-29 | BP2025-01590 | 5202 - Clinic · Alteration Interior Alterations | $180,000 | Completed |
| 2023-06-28 | BP2023-10255 | 4002 - Vacant · Alteration Interior alteration. | $10,000 | Completed |
| 2023-05-24 | BP2023-07637 | 5202 - Clinic · Alteration Interior Alteration - Renovation | $221,000 | Completed |
| 2023-01-20 | BP2023-00739 | 3799 - Personal Service. Misc. · Alteration New Group D massage tenant | — | Completed |
| 2022-01-17 | BP2022-00697 | 5202 - Clinic · Alteration Interior Alterations, Group D | $100,000 | Completed |
| 2021-09-14 | BP2021-16147 | 5299 - Medical Misc. · Alteration Interior Alterations | $100,000 | Completed |
| 2021-03-03 | BP2021-03209 | 5299 - Medical Misc. · Alteration Interior alterations (Innomar Strategies). | $70,000 | Completed |
| 2019-01-24 | BP2019-00789 | 3106 - Retail Shop · Alteration Interior Alteration - Health Plus Pharmacy | $19,000 | Completed |
Declared estimated project cost across all 12 non-residential building permits on the parcel since 2012: $907,750. Permit descriptions are the City’s records at retrieval; applicant and contractor names are not reproduced.
Inspections
What City inspectors recorded against the permits on this parcel.
60 inspection results are published against 12 of the 12 building permits on this parcel, from 2015-07-02 to 2025-07-22. 2 inspections used a life-safety checklist and 6 a barrier-free checklist.
What was inspected
Result of each visit
| Outcome | Inspections |
|---|---|
| Acceptable | 21 |
| Not Acceptable | 17 |
| Acceptable Add Inspection | 14 |
| Acceptable with Conditions | 8 |
Stage
| Inspection type | Count |
|---|---|
| Final | 30 |
| Progress | 24 |
| Framing | 6 |
The 14 most recent inspection results
| Date | Permit | Stage | Checklist | Outcome | Inspector note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-07-22 | BP2025-01590 | Final | All Directives | Acceptable | No deficiencies noted. No further building inspections are required. |
| 2025-07-02 | BP2025-01590 | Final | All Directives | Not Acceptable | Correct noted deficiencies and recall building inspection. |
| 2023-11-10 | BP2023-07637 | Final | General Inspection Observations | Acceptable | Tenant Improvement Inspections Observations were: Emergency lighting and exit signage as required.Sprinkler verification received and uploaded to file.Trade permits completed.No changes to fire alarm system on plans, or observed during inspection. Verification not required. |
| 2023-11-10 | BP2023-07637 | Final | Field Level Hazard Assessment (FLHA) | Acceptable | Field Level Hazard Assessment: No hazards identified, PPE worn, sunny/clear, site safety controls in place. |
| 2023-09-22 | BP2023-10255 | Final | General Inspection Observations | Acceptable | Tenant Improvement Inspections Observations were: Trade permits completed.Emergency lighting and exit signage as required.Sprinkler verification received and uploaded to file.No alterations to Fire Alarm system. |
| 2023-09-22 | BP2023-10255 | Final | Field Level Hazard Assessment (FLHA) | Acceptable | Field Level Hazard Assessment: Hazards present at time of inspection:None identifiedPPE worn at time of inspection:High visibility vest, steel toe bootsWeather conditions at time of inspection:SunshineWere site safety controls in place at time of inspection:Yes |
| 2023-03-22 | BP2023-00739 | Progress | Field Level Hazard Assessment (FLHA) | Acceptable | Field Level Hazard Assessment: Hazards present at time of inspection: None identified PPE worn at time of inspection: High visibility vest, steel toe boots Weather conditions at time of inspection: Sunshine Were site safety controls in place at time of inspection: Yes |
| 2023-03-22 | BP2023-00739 | Progress | General Inspection Observations | Acceptable | Tenant Improvement Inspections Observations were: Emergency lighting and exit signage in place. No change to partitions, HVAC, or sprinklers. |
| 2023-03-22 | BP2023-00739 | Progress | Directives | Acceptable | No Infractions Noted - No Further BLDG. Inspections Required |
| 2022-09-13 | BP2021-16147 | Final | Directives | Not Acceptable | File complete upon receipt of documents |
| 2022-09-13 | BP2021-16147 | Final | Documents Commercial | Not Acceptable | Schedule C-2 from the Registered Professional of Record - Mechanical Engineers C-2 schedule missing information, complete and resubmit. - C-2 schedule from the electrical engineer is missing. |
| 2022-08-02 | BP2021-16147 | Final | Exiting | Not Acceptable | — |
| 2022-08-02 | BP2021-16147 | Final | Directives | Not Acceptable | Correct and RECALL inspection. |
| 2022-08-02 | BP2021-16147 | Final | Documents Commercial | Not Acceptable | Schedule C-1 from the Coordinating Registered Professional To be provided at recall. |
An inspection result is a record of one visit, not a verdict on the building. 17 of these 60 results are recorded as Not Acceptable. In the City's process a Not Acceptable result is an ordinary step: the inspector lists what must change and the work is re-inspected, which is why the most common outcome across the record is Acceptable Add Inspection. Most results relate to a single tenant improvement rather than the whole building. Inspector notes are The City of Calgary's own text at retrieval, with contact details removed; applicant and contractor names are never read.
The City of Calgary Building Inspections Results, joined to building permits by permit number, retrieved 2026-09-24.
Occupiers and licensed businesses
The public record of who operates on the parcel, labelled by source.
Businesses licensed by the City on this parcel 4 as of 2026-09-24
| Licensed business | Address | Licence type | Status | Licensed since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Face & Body Wellness Centre | 290 Midpark Way SE | Personal Service, Massage Centre (Commercial), Retail Dealer - Premises | Licensed | 2023 |
| Monto Ink | 290 Midpark Way SE | Personal Service (Tattoo), Retail Dealer - Premises | Licensed | 2023 |
| Young And Beauty House | 290 Midpark Way SE | Personal Service, Massage Centre (Commercial) | Licensed | 2023 |
| Individually licensed practitioner | 290 Midpark Way SE | Personal Service | Licensed | 2024 |
Not a tenant roster. The City licenses specific business types (retail, food service, personal services, contractors, wholesalers, schools and similar). Most office occupiers such as professional firms need no municipal licence and do not appear here. Matched by civic address and by licence location inside the parcel; home-based licences are excluded.
No individuals are named. The City issues many personal-service licences to people trading under their own name. Suite numbers are never published, and where a licence reads as an individual rather than an organisation the name is withheld and only the licence category is shown; 1 of the 4 licences on this parcel is withheld on that basis. Names of sources this site does not use are omitted.
Nearby office buildings
The six nearest office building sites in the record, by straight-line distance between parcel centroids.
Where this building sits in the record
Every collection this building belongs to, from the same public data shown above.
290 Midpark Way SE questions
Answers drawn from the record.
How tall is 290 Midpark Way SE?
The main structure on the parcel has a LiDAR roof height of 14.4 m in The City of Calgary’s 3D building data, a storey-equivalent of about 4 at 3.9 m per storey.
When was 290 Midpark Way SE built?
The City’s assessment roll records 1980 as the year of construction.
What is the assessed value of 290 Midpark Way SE?
The City of Calgary assesses this parcel at $2.7M in total on the 2026 roll, 549th of 822 sites in this record. Assessed value is the City’s figure for property tax, not a sale price or an asking price.
What is 290 Midpark Way SE zoned?
The parcel is designated I-B, Industrial - Business, under the City of Calgary Land Use Bylaw. Confirm the designation and any amendments with the City before relying on it.
Which CTrain station is closest to 290 Midpark Way SE?
Shawnessy Station, 488 m in a straight line from the parcel centroid.
Who is in 290 Midpark Way SE?
The City of Calgary business licence register lists 4 licensed businesses at this address or inside the parcel as of 2026-09-24, shown in the occupiers section. Most office occupiers such as professional firms do not need a municipal licence, so the register is not a tenant roster.
Has 290 Midpark Way SE been inspected?
The City publishes 60 inspection results against 12 permits here, between 2015-07-02 and 2025-07-22. 2 used a life-safety checklist such as fire separations, firestopping or emergency lighting. 6 used the barrier-free checklist. Each result records one visit and most relate to a single tenant improvement, so this is not a verdict on the building.
How good is transit at 290 Midpark Way SE?
71 scheduled transit trips call within 300 m of the parcel on a representative weekday, 8 of them in the morning peak, across 2 routes. The closest stop is SB Midpark BV @ Midpark GA SE, 140 m away. That is the published schedule for one service period, not observed service, and it counts each trip once however many stops it makes nearby.
Can staff cycle or get there in winter at 290 Midpark Way SE?
The best-rated cycling facility within 400 m is a major street, 107 m away. The parcel fronts a Priority 1 snow and ice clearing route. These are straight-line tests against City layers.
Where can visitors park at 290 Midpark Way SE?
No Active paid on-street parking zone lies within 200 m of this parcel in the City's tariff dataset. Free, permit-only and off-street parking are not recorded in that source, so this is not a statement that parking is unavailable.
Is office space available at 290 Midpark Way SE?
This profile is built from public records and does not track availability, rents or tenancy. Submit a private requirement and current options in the building or nearby will be confirmed through Commercially.
Public record sources: Current Year Property Assessments (Parcel), Historical Property Assessments (Parcel), Assessment Subproperty Use Codes, 3D Buildings - Citywide (LiDAR roof outlines), Land Use Districts, Transit LRT Stations, Green Line Stations, Plus 15, Historic Resource (Inventory of Evaluated Historic Resources), Development Permits, Building Permits, Calgary Existing Buildings - Performance Metrics (BenchmarkYYC), Calgary Business Licenses, On-Street Parking Zones with Rates, Building Inspections Results, Residential Parking Zones, Snow and Ice Clearing Priority Routes, Traffic Signals, Calgary Bikeways — The City of Calgary, retrieved 2026-09-24. Contains information licensed under the Open Government Licence – City of Calgary. Building names, floor counts and architects, where shown, come from Wikidata (CC0). No brokerage, listing-data or commercial research source is used.
Boundary: Assessed values are the City’s assessment-roll figures for taxation and are not sale prices, asking rents, vacancy or availability; Alberta does not publish transaction prices. LiDAR heights are roof-surface elevations above the lowest ground point at the building perimeter and can differ from architectural heights. Storey equivalents are derived at 3.9 m per storey and are not floor counts. Distances are straight-line. Permit descriptions are the City’s records at retrieval and do not establish current use, tenancy or availability. Read the methodology.